Favorite headline
Favorite headline
Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) speaks during a press conference. (Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
Rep Stansbury: βThe president & his admin canβt explain a legal justification for an eminent threat that gave them the authority to use the militaryβ
They canβt provide an explanation of their war plan β they canβt explain why theyβve killed over 200 civilians β the president needs to be impeachedβ
So tired of the press putting up with the bullying behavior of this administration.
The whole concern of losing access means they can't follow up.
Not usually a fan of congress banging away on people in hearings but relentless can work against the arrogant "I can't believe you would ask me"(Nome)
The Department of Justice has sued 30 states and DC for access to their unreacted sensitive voter data. My law firm is fighting them in all 30 cases.
We are dedicating so many resources because these are the most important legal fights and the future of free and fair elections is at stake.
Lucifer has a point
Is this a subtweet at God?
What does God need with a government?
<this is a Stat Trek subtweet>
The Supreme Court already made it clear Trump didn't have the authority to impose the first round of tariffs. Now, the administration is trying again under a different statute that doesn't apply. We're suing him again.
Responsibility? How quaint. These people won't even admit to facts, why would they admit fault?
The point is to use the 'Imminent Threat' language as an excuse for the attacks without a 'war'.
But, of course, it's bullshit. It's like chasing down someone, shooting them, and then claiming a 'stand your ground' law as an excuse.
Would be great if a reporter pushed back and pointed out that they know why that language is being used but ask whether this claim would stand up in court.
It's like chasing down someone, shooting them, and then claiming a 'stand your ground' law as an excuse.
Instafollow
Instablock.
DEMOCRATS:
Now is the time for non-stop airing of Trump call g the military βSUCKERS AND LOSERSβ
Americans are dead. Prices are skyrocketing. The Middle East is on fire. Civil war is brewing in Iran.
And for what? A war that will leave the same hardliners in charge? A war that can't actually destroy their nuclear program?
This is incompetence. Plain and simple.
Oh hell,I. So madi have to go puke again!
Why can't we have grown ups in government?
Oh, ffs.
Perhaps 'natural selection' vs. 'intelligent design' is a false dichotomy.
Looking at the world today, have we given 'stupid selection' any consideration?
This war isn't about Iran.
Don't let him off the hook.he was bad before he went crazy.
Reference causes instant follow.
No notes.
Yes, I mean, that was the original point being made by Adams. Smart man even if he did like his digital watch.
This war is about ignoring the Epstein files.
This war is about allowing ICE attacks.
This war is about covering up the economic failures.
This war is about shutting down elections.
This war is about letting lesser people die to get what they want.
Any cover idiot cult members provide is a bonus.
all going to according to not having a plan
None of those are Evangelical Maga holidays so they don't count.
Just keep saying it until enough of your people believe it, or until you pivot.
Real decisions are made behind the curtains at maralagoo.
Why isnβt ICE on the front lines. They make more
It's the Epstein files.
It's the ICE murderers.
It's the Economy, stupid.
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."
-Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1953
"Here's what made him change his mind"...
the @apnews.com article here is a travesty because it does not mention Epstein or ICE or the economy -- all of which are larger factors than any "policy" that could change his mind