Nice assertions. It'd be a shame if someone continued to ask you to back them up with literally any evidence at all.
Since OPs claims are supposedly not compelling, finding something 1/10 as compelling should be easy for you, right?
Nice assertions. Be a shame if someone asked you to provide evidence even 1/10th as compelling as what you've been provided with above.
Also, 2009 was when the Army had spent the last 4 years handing out waivers like candy & was just starting to change course.
apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA...
73% voted that his stated reason for going to war (Iran's alleged nuclear program) is legitimate.
Could someone get me in contact with the Magnus Institute? I have questions about how to become a devoted avatar of The Extinction.
"Avatar of revenge" you say???
White dude named "Hunter" "studied" WWII for decades?
Yeah I'd believe he didn't know about the totenkopf. Statistically speaking, he hasn't even learned about the Holocaust yet because he was too busy being enamored by a military dictatorship.
Please, tell me more about your views on race-mixing and blood pollution.
What good is power when you're too wise to use it?
Whereas the regime's refusal to abandon its nuclear program and related missile and conventional weapons activities further resulted in the reimposition of 6 United Nations Security Council Resolutions targeting the Iranian regime in September 2025; and Whereas, according to the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, Iran has amassed a large stockpile of enriched uranium and continues to block access to undeclared sites in Iran affiliated with their 'big, ambitious nuclear program'': Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives declares it is the policy of the United States that Iran continues to be the largest state sponsor of terrorism.
To be clear, yes. This was a vote to agree with Trump's "reasons" for going to war.
The time for falling for "I'm not touching you" games is long over.
Trump says Iran was going to attack imminently so we have to go to war.
Congress says "Well, Iran does love terrorist attack, unlike the noble US."
If you're waiting for Dems to come out & say "we're controlled opposition" why?
Kamala: *Makes "war with Iran" everything short of a campaign promise.*
Liberals: "You Leftists really think we'd be going to war with Iran if Kamala was president?!"
Trump: *provides a dizzying array of conflicting justifications for war.*
73% of House Dems: "Yeah, that's a good enough reason!"
Because Israel is basically a US proxy state? The US has been at war for 230/250 years. That's all it knows how to do.
Israel is a genocidal state. The US was Hitler's inspiration for how to do genocide.
It's not that Israel owns the US. It's that Israel & the US independently want the same thing.
It should be literally illegal for any school to fail to teach all of the ways that Woodrow Wilson laid the groundwork for WWII
The Great Chain of Being goes: Humans, Animals, Plants, Inanimate matter/objects, conservatives.
The high social dominance orientation of conservatives means they can only function when given a clear hierarchy. We are harming them & ourselves by treating them as if they're on par with humans.
BLUESKY: we coded our entire website in claude so unfortunately we have no idea how to make it so you can't block the guy whose job is to prevent your friends from seeing your posts if you're too rude to a pedophile
There's only so long that one side can take hostages before the other side has to start following suit.
Torn between "don't punish the behavior you want to see" and "ok, but the behavior I want to see isn't 'being an opportunistic snake'."
abolish ICE is a majority position among INDEPENDENTS AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC
you have 23% among REPUBLICANS
we have at least three more years of this shit
what I am saying is: the next Dem president had better be ready to walk into DHS with a chainsaw on Day 1
Oh my god. Moral relativism? Really?
Let me guess, you recently figured out that God doesn't exist, and didn't know what to do now that "objective morality" doesn't make sense, so you just grabbed the first thing you saw.
How... uninspired and wearying.
Multiple Flags on the play:
Avoiding the Issue: We're talking about you.
Motte and Bailey: your argument was "some teachers are bad therefore all teachers are bad", now that that's untenable you're retreating to a superficially similar argument.
Penalties compound. 25 yard penalty. 3rd down.
Flag on the play: strawman.
Your statement is in "if...then" creating a false conditional.
Mine is in an implied "and" format (that teaching 1) does exist in society and 2) is aimed at society's betterment) creatina non-conditional assertion of two premises.
10 yard penalty, second down.
Hey, acknowledgement that you're being a bad person! That's a start!
You are, as a matter of fact, making it other people's problem. Go to therapy and deal with it there.
*literally tell an
Some folks will literally declare an entire profession aimed at the betterment of society that their expertise makes them a class traitor, rather than go to therapy.
Okay no but
Wait what's the payout if I say "no" and win??? I might need to put all my savings into this.
But you wouldn't say that someone who just generally "isn't a dog person" can't possibly be "not a dog person" because they don't have a phobia.
Just like you can't say a trans person isn't trans because they don't have dysphoria.
Well if I have 100 people in a room, and say "everyone who IS a dog person take one step forward" do the people with a dog phobia step forward? Obviously not.
People with a dog phobia are not "dog people". They differ from other's who aren't "dog people" in their psychological reaction to dogs.
