Power, The's Avatar

Power, The

@agp.ceo

New Year, New Pussy Embedder of Little Gay People In Your Computer πŸ‘­πŸ’Ύ Transsexual Menace created by a US State Department Thinktank Cis Woman Extraordinaire, CEO of AGP Industries, Inc.

1,869
Followers
577
Following
15,044
Posts
14.12.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Power, The @agp.ceo

- Australian Zoologist

07.03.2026 14:06 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

the existence of adderall implies the existence of subtracternone, multiplierthem and dividerup

06.03.2026 19:51 πŸ‘ 97 πŸ” 36 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1

thinking normal things about the US gestapo right now

07.03.2026 14:01 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

on it

07.03.2026 13:56 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

yeah saw him out and about lmao

07.03.2026 13:50 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

(it was Ken K) i coulda yapped more but didn't wanna bug him

07.03.2026 06:38 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

lowkey fangirling because i got to meet and talk with an independent journalist i follow about the the global surveillence state we live in

07.03.2026 06:32 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

ghouls

07.03.2026 06:30 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

every person in this is depraved, evil, needs to be put in prison for the rest of their lives and must suffer for these crimes against humanity

07.03.2026 06:21 πŸ‘ 2948 πŸ” 488 πŸ’¬ 39 πŸ“Œ 5

glad to see you back. this is a banger

07.03.2026 06:26 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Israel is like if β€œwhere my hug at” was a country

07.03.2026 04:24 πŸ‘ 188 πŸ” 31 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1

true!!

06.03.2026 21:00 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

computers in the 80s were gay and computers in the 2020s are straight

06.03.2026 20:59 πŸ‘ 466 πŸ” 86 πŸ’¬ 21 πŸ“Œ 9

this is weaponized cringe

06.03.2026 20:07 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

unbearably cringe government. cowards using drones and bombs and ai to murder hundreds of people and doing it behind a veil of dweeb pop culture schlock. irredeemable country.

06.03.2026 18:54 πŸ‘ 10 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image
06.03.2026 19:19 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Lily Oilembargo is a statistical outlier and she should not have been counted

06.03.2026 20:03 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

american century of humiliation incoming

06.03.2026 17:39 πŸ‘ 2418 πŸ” 272 πŸ’¬ 65 πŸ“Œ 61

Holy fucking shit. 'If Trump says we won then we won' is even further down the hole than the Orwell quote people always dig up about eyes and ears. He attacked Iran so he could win another fake award. That's it. That's the whole thing. That's wild

06.03.2026 18:51 πŸ‘ 1565 πŸ” 334 πŸ’¬ 64 πŸ“Œ 17

Construction worker hearing a joke about how drywallers are all racist pill heads on their third DUI who piss in bottles and leave them inside your walls: πŸ™‚

This audience: ermmm, can see your CV then

06.03.2026 15:27 πŸ‘ 394 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Perfect example of why everyone hates tech people. Perpetually aggrieved self righteous douchebags who cant even take the lightest ribbing of their unwarranted sense of self importance lol

06.03.2026 15:16 πŸ‘ 1499 πŸ” 331 πŸ’¬ 13 πŸ“Œ 1
Isaac Chotiner: What should or should not prevent a U.S. President from deciding that he or she can wage military action or bomb another country if he or she wants to? What should be the constraints? It doesn’t seem like Trump has laid out a clear reasoning for why he’s doing this.

Rep. Greg Landsman: I think the Administration has. I think Marco Rubio did lay out a clear reason for doing this now, why it was important, and why it will be limited. Again, Trump is not a disciplined person, and so his communication has been all over the place, and that is, in and of itself, bad.

Rubio also said on Monday, β€œThere absolutely was an imminent threat, and the imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked and we believed they would be attacked [by Israel], that they would immediately come after us, and we were not going to sit there and absorb a blow before we responded.” What did you make of that statement?

I was really disappointed that he tried to lay the blame on somebody else.

Especially because Rubio is not the erratic one. That’s Trump.

Exactly. I was disappointed in that, but especially when he clearly set out to make one argument during that whole press conference, which was this is a focussed operation on the missiles and the missile launchers and the nukes and the ships.

Not the nukes. They don’t have nukes.

Sorry, you’re right. The facilities, the nuclear facilities. And he was locked in on that, and I think that is the argument. I think that is the operation. That has to be what they continue to focus on. That he would veer from that was disappointing, and I suspect he was disappointed.
That’s definitely telling us that he’s thinking about these things.

Yeah. Look, it’s obviously multiple countries and not just Israel. This is becoming a much bigger moment. Despite real tragedies here, which are awfulβ€”and there’s nothing to say other than it’s terribleβ€”may this all be for something very powerful and good and transformative, which is the end…

Isaac Chotiner: What should or should not prevent a U.S. President from deciding that he or she can wage military action or bomb another country if he or she wants to? What should be the constraints? It doesn’t seem like Trump has laid out a clear reasoning for why he’s doing this. Rep. Greg Landsman: I think the Administration has. I think Marco Rubio did lay out a clear reason for doing this now, why it was important, and why it will be limited. Again, Trump is not a disciplined person, and so his communication has been all over the place, and that is, in and of itself, bad. Rubio also said on Monday, β€œThere absolutely was an imminent threat, and the imminent threat was that we knew that if Iran was attacked and we believed they would be attacked [by Israel], that they would immediately come after us, and we were not going to sit there and absorb a blow before we responded.” What did you make of that statement? I was really disappointed that he tried to lay the blame on somebody else. Especially because Rubio is not the erratic one. That’s Trump. Exactly. I was disappointed in that, but especially when he clearly set out to make one argument during that whole press conference, which was this is a focussed operation on the missiles and the missile launchers and the nukes and the ships. Not the nukes. They don’t have nukes. Sorry, you’re right. The facilities, the nuclear facilities. And he was locked in on that, and I think that is the argument. I think that is the operation. That has to be what they continue to focus on. That he would veer from that was disappointing, and I suspect he was disappointed. That’s definitely telling us that he’s thinking about these things. Yeah. Look, it’s obviously multiple countries and not just Israel. This is becoming a much bigger moment. Despite real tragedies here, which are awfulβ€”and there’s nothing to say other than it’s terribleβ€”may this all be for something very powerful and good and transformative, which is the end…

hydrogen bomb vs. coughing baby.jpg

04.03.2026 19:43 πŸ‘ 424 πŸ” 52 πŸ’¬ 9 πŸ“Œ 13

having 3 glasses of wine on the plane and whispering to the man sitting in front of me that we need to get to the pilots

06.03.2026 17:57 πŸ‘ 54 πŸ” 7 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

🫩

06.03.2026 18:58 πŸ‘ 45 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

sun tzu was really like "know ur enemies plan, dont tell them ur plan" and that shit went platinum

06.03.2026 18:57 πŸ‘ 18 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

The damage control they're running on this is not very reassuring.

06.03.2026 18:52 πŸ‘ 12 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
06.03.2026 16:28 πŸ‘ 5353 πŸ” 1189 πŸ’¬ 28 πŸ“Œ 22

water with the pulp

06.03.2026 16:50 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
EPA Unveils Plan To Make Water Chunkier

EPA Unveils Plan To Make Water Chunkier

EPA Unveils Plan To Make Water Chunkier https://theonion.com/epa-unveils-plan-to-make-water-chunkier/

06.03.2026 16:01 πŸ‘ 1070 πŸ” 103 πŸ’¬ 25 πŸ“Œ 6
Post image

...yeah, alright ...I'll show myself out.

06.03.2026 16:07 πŸ‘ 69 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0