Jackson Waite for Congress

I’ll need a little more than 300 characters so when my proposed policy is rewritten to include your worst fears I will share it. Take the W. You expanded my world view. And yes I think the state should keep secrets from enemies and adversaries but congressional oversight is essential to that.

LFG.

I learned a lot here including that I sort of look like Sloth but I’m happy that a law written to protect corporations accidentally provides enormous safeguards for LGBTQ and other communities. I intended to replace that law to protect folks on purpose. A duty to protect people not lies and abuse.

Father of Georgia school shooter found guilty of murder and manslaughter | CNN Colin Gray, the father of Georgia school shooter Colt Gray, was found guilty of murder and manslaughter charges Tuesday in a case testing the limits of who is responsible for a mass shooting.

I was days away from turning 18 when news of Columbine arrived at my high school. I have said it after every massacre since that day: parents are responsible for how they raise their children. If this result terrifies you listen to that fear and step it up. Kids only need love, all of it and always.

Not AI I really do look like a guy with the first 30 Minutes of a Sloth makeup application.

I went to art school I like peace and solitude I’m not doing this because I’m lonely. I’m doing this because no one else is. And why aren’t they? You know where to find this sloth looking two face motherfucker when you have a good idea to fix and I’ll post a video next week and you can see it’s

Oblivious to your anger at me which I’m not or oblivious to something else. Believe me I understand and see now a sensitivity to 230 I literally didn’t know existed until yesterday. But I still think this particular law isn’t providing the best protections that we could have.

Grateful to have had my world view expanded.

She didn’t have an account. That is my point. And I am seriously happy to hear ideas about how to protect children without abandoning the protections you and these other folks think 230 provides. I don’t think my mistake here is my opinion but I understand fully now what I triggered and I am

I’m not playing victim I was giving you context for trashing my face. Seriously, we are writers your cadence and structure of your daggers were objectively funny.

Last time I sent a screen shot I got dragged like I’m some boomer just tell me the question.

My eye muscle is damaged from an old injury so I see it. And I will answer anything, I seriously don’t see your question. But if you only want to hurt my feelings it needs to be more in the realm of my neurodivergence or my struggles with clarity and communication. Those are my particular traumas.

Then I am here for it.

anything other than to adjudicate those wounds created by those that look like me. Regardless I’ll happily take that beating from you and for you if it will keep you safe. If my words and ideas give you no relief and a textual whooping is the only way that I can be of service to you in this moment

I also believe that pain and injury and harm to the body or spirit should guide our progress not prevent it. My original comment is what I believe and if you can conclude from that belief that I am not an ally to your human rights then I’m not sure you’re wanting

And I very well might be too earnest and cis and white and male for you to see and hear in this cynical circular mess of chaos we now live in. I accept that too. But this is an engineering problem not a culture war. So while real wounds exist here that prevent connection

And to other defenders of 230 Instead of trying to erase and humiliate me because I’m a cis white man that thinks laws governing the internet should protect human rights not corporations— why not lead with the nuance you believe in? I am a thoughtful considerate person that can hear and see you.

But of course it’s true I can and should consider more thoughtfully, the unintended consequences of 230s removal which I’ll happily do since I’m not the piece of shit your followers would like me to be.

And I’m sorry too. I didn’t sift through attacks on my character with more focus but I still don’t think protecting marginalized people online means giving full immunity to multibillion dollar publishers of racist, homophobic and violent abuse.

I showed my wife this and she said “Oh it’s cause you’re uneven.” And then guffawed. So thank you, no matter what you actually meant, it landed.

Lol. Okay.

Yes. Exactly. I think I have a better solution to protect free speech and keep people safe. And since you’re interested in my campaign now, I think minimum wage for everyone including part time retail employees should be $40.00/hour and everyone earning less than 200k/year should be fed tax exempt.

This is how it showed up on my end.

I’ll send you whatever you want. The case is transferred to the ND of Texas. What’s your email? I’ll add you to the filing distribution so you can learn from a person who cares about human dignity instead of whatever it is that happened. It’s not me. I’m sorry to say you got the wrong guy, pal.

I actually didn’t know how opposed to removing section 230 you were until right now I couldn’t disagree with you more and I’m happy to debate it with you, but you’ve revealed yourself to be remarkably uncool and so good luck to you.

My 10 year old daughter with racist and sexual language directed at her and federal
Court has different rules than state court. There’s nuance which I thought you would get since you think of yourself as a critical thinker:

lol a filing error is your standard of dumb? You’re joking a piling on of someone who actually supports your work because we disagree about a statute? I went to art school you asshole I’d love to see your legal writing. And since you’re asking I was uncomfortable efiling an unredacted photograph of

Are nothing more than a bunch of fucking loser DNC interns reading scripts from unemployable gatekeepers on the Epstein list and to the fucking moron who’s trying to fucking pin me as an antisemite: lol.

Look, I’m sure you are expressing all of that in good faith. Clearly you see the good intention of the law however, a law written about technology in 1996 is at best inappropriate..

Section 230 harms more LBGTQ folks than Putin could in his dreams.

Is this a poop joke?